This is exactly what occurred to me when I stumbled upon a rather uncommon tale of a biology educator that was involved in a grown-up nature of activity. The educator, who will continue to be anonymous for the purpose of this story, was a man in his prime and was liked by all his trainees for gogogocheck his training skills and his capability to make the most complex ideas appear straightforward.

It was not until one day when among the trainees stumbled upon the teacher’s computer and inadvertently opened up the web browser history that the entire institution was surprised. The instructor had been checking out a rather suspicious looking internet site and the web content on it was far from the normal instructional material. The trainees were shocked and did not know just how to respond but the instructor just smiled and told them that it was just a part of his research for the course.

The incident became a topic of conversation in the school and individuals started to wonder if the educator’s activities were ideal or not. Some individuals believed that he was establishing a negative instance for the students while others felt that it was just a plain fantasy and did not hurt anybody. The teacher nonetheless stayed calm and composed and remained to educate as if nothing had occurred.

This case made me consider the duty of an instructor in culture. Is the instructor meant to be a good example or can she or he have an exclusive life? Should the teacher’s actions in the classroom be controlled or should he or she be provided the freedom to reveal himself or herself? These are inquiries that have no clear responses but they certainly contribute to the complexity of the story of the biology teacher pornography.